Logic + Emotion recently published an article about information dissemination. With a suggested reasoning that prior to today's social media tools, perhaps most of us were hoarding information.
Knowledge hoarders are really good at soaking up knowledge. They can also be very good at expressing what they know in an engaging fashion—but what makes them hoarders is that they don’t always disclose the how. Speaking of—how do I know all this? Because prior to blogging, I probably was a knowledge hoarder to some extent (even if I didn’t realize it)."
Assuming I'm understanding the context in which L+E is epitomizing it's How/Share concept, I don't disgree with hoarding. However, I don't think How/Share is new. In-fact, as I stare at the graphic accompanying the article I'm reminded of the power of branding. A company's brand dichotomy could easily replace the terms associated with the call outs. Beginning with strategy and creative. Each call out easily replaceable with, Ideas, Products, Consumer, Development–and so on. And on a social and philosophical level, if
Nietzsche saw this, he might perceive it as the diagram of an individuals
Will-to-Power and self awareness. My point, we've always shared. Or at the least, desperately wanted too. It's inherently dependent on growth and I suspect a natural human motive stemming from curiosity.
Knowledge is growing directly in relation to the amount of people contributing to it without regard for social or economical barriers. Language barriers don't exist. Knowledge is systematic growth based on interoperation without ration. Distribution of knowledge and experience without constraints or ethical reservation generally held by the morally decaying foundations of science, religion and politics within
World 1.0. Nothing inferred by an over zealous teacher, politician or religious figure, learning becomes organic. An
unsettling truth has no place to hide.
With this in mind, what do we do with all of this? We share it. We have to. We want to engage in a conversation about it. For the first time ever, we all have an open conversation with the world. A casual one at that. In some cases, the How/Share concept can certainly be attributed to selfish motives but more then likely a true blogger will go beyond self-promotion. Teaching and informing with selling as a possible extension thereafter.
Some claim that this information overload isn't healthy. I believe the internet offers a simple solution not previously offered in any other academic environment regarding information or knowledge. A solution without linear constraints regarding progressive thought. Most proposed curriculum's still alienate the objective mind's power of observation and processes which subsequently lead to a notion or even contradictory thoughts.–Choice. The internet offers choice. As simple as it sounds, that's where we are now. We have a shit load of choices. But unlike the traditional media-scapes the previously offered
choice, the internet demands we engage it beyond the visual plane with choice as motive and entertainment as a result thereof. Never mind the quantity of information, first and foremost it offers an individual the ability to seek by choice. When and where-how and what. Learning is no longer static. Knowledge is dynamically restructured based on it's participants and contributions. At some point, I imagine AdSense programs becoming RelativeSense. You get what you give.
Back to How/Share, my view, it was previously to expensive for most social classes to take part in How/Share. Thinking, overall, is know leveraged. World 2.0, Share how.